If a one engine inoperative approach and landing is conducted with a reverser deployed, how does landing distance change?

If a one engine inoperative approach and landing is conducted with a reverser deployed, how does landing distance change?

• A. The landing distance will increase approximately 40%.
• B. The landing distance will decrease.
• C. The landing distance remains the same.
• D. The landing distance will increase approximately 20%.

Answer: (D)

When landing with one engine inoperative, you have less thrust available to slow the airplane and you must manage the flight with asymmetrical thrust, which can affect directional control and braking effectiveness. Deploying reverse thrust on the remaining engine helps, but it can’t fully compensate for the loss of the second engine. The combination means you dissipate energy more slowly and require a bit more runway to stop. For the Beechjet 400A performing OEI approach and landing with the reverser deployed, published performance data show about a 20% increase in landing distance compared with a normal two-engine landing. So the best answer is that landing distance will increase approximately 20%. Not fitting are ideas that it would decrease, stay the same, or grow as much as 40%, since the engine-out condition and the limited reverse-thrust contribution from a single engine produce only a modest increase in required runway.

When landing with one engine inoperative, you have less thrust available to slow the airplane and you must manage the flight with asymmetrical thrust, which can affect directional control and braking effectiveness. Deploying reverse thrust on the remaining engine helps, but it can’t fully compensate for the loss of the second engine. The combination means you dissipate energy more slowly and require a bit more runway to stop.

For the Beechjet 400A performing OEI approach and landing with the reverser deployed, published performance data show about a 20% increase in landing distance compared with a normal two-engine landing. So the best answer is that landing distance will increase approximately 20%.

Not fitting are ideas that it would decrease, stay the same, or grow as much as 40%, since the engine-out condition and the limited reverse-thrust contribution from a single engine produce only a modest increase in required runway.